“The ones that will succeed in the future will develop technology that understands data as humans do”

Ivor Bihar

Interview with Ivor Bihar, COO of Mediatoolkit, a media intelligence company in Croatia.

Hi Ivor, what is your background and what is included in your current role at Mediatoolkit?

I’ve been working on Mediatoolkit since the company’s beginnings in 2014. Currently, I’m Mediatoolkit’s Chief Operations Officer leading and growing the company’s teams including sales, product development, design, and marketing across the various stages of the company’s development. Since we began, Mediatoolkit has grown from two to over 50 people, with the goal to achieve 80% growth in employee numbers in 2022.

What differentiates Mediatoolkit from other media intelligence companies?

Since the beginning, we’ve been developing our proprietary online media monitoring technology that tracks more than 100 million online sources in any language across 250 locations in real time. This is the major differentiator.

It’s our goal to enable customers to make better business decisions based on relevant information from the media delivered by Mediatoolkit. Our whole organization focuses on helping PR and Media Monitoring professionals in any industry to gain value through using Mediatoolkit.

What are your greatest challenges ahead at Mediatoolkit when it comes to serving your customers and developing your offering?

Standing out in a crowded market is a challenge for every provider in our space. We’re laser-focused on delivering the best possible experience and continuing to expand the coverage of the ever-expanding number of sources that grows daily.

Educating our customers on what to do with the data we provide is always a challenge, but we want to make sure that clients receive the full value of Mediatoolkit.

Have you recently, or do you plan to, release any new technology-based solutions that will add to or improve the services you offer your clients?

We’re focused on market and user research to ensure that the features we deliver consistently are in line with user expectations, and that they solve real problems. Our focus is also on educating our customers and the market about PR topics: vanity metrics, connecting their PR effort with their company’s results, setting and measuring PR KPIs and the other usual suspects.

We’re also developing a new product that will combine media monitoring and machine learning to enable Disaster Warning System powered by artificial intelligence.

All customers come with different levels of knowledge. What are the most common misconceptions that your clients have regarding what media intelligence can give them?

Media intelligence capabilities are still not well-known throughout all industries, and we often get very different requests. Some companies look at media monitoring as a niche and a small part of their PR or marketing efforts, while others, in contrast, see it as the solution to all their problems.

So far, the most common misconception is that media intelligence is a magic bullet that you set up just one time. Many don’t realise that regular effort must be put into media intelligence if you are to get relevant results and adapt to changing circumstances and contexts of companies and the markets they operate in.

When it comes to the actual data behind the media intelligence you do, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

We are in an industry that is always hungry for more sources of information, and we have to keep up with new platforms and ways people share content online. Organizations, however, are facing issues with large volumes of data they are unable to process and drive insights from.

If we drill down to a source level, one of the examples of underutilised sources is definitely Reddit. It’s still not recognised enough, and many customers don’t consider it. On the other hand, TikTok is becoming more and more important, but its impact remains to be seen when it comes to media monitoring.

Privacy around the use of social data is an emerging challenge. How do you think that will affect the media intelligence industry?

Just like social media platforms are working to protect users’ data privacy, we also need to ensure compliance with changes and educate our clients on the importance of respecting privacy. We take data privacy very seriously. It’s our responsibility, but also a challenge, to continue increasing our database of tracked sources without compromising an inch of anyone’s privacy. It is challenging to consider all the regulations, but it’s a necessity that cannot and will not be avoided.

If the future holds anonymised and aggregated content, building trust around the technology that provides insights on top of that data will become an even bigger challenge for the industry.

Is there a specific mouthwatering case that you know of where media intelligence has played a crucial role for a client?

Mouthwatering cases are where clients immediately see substantial business benefits and a quick return on their investment. The most common use cases that our customers use Mediatoolkit for are crisis management, campaign, brand monitoring, competition analysis, and sentiment tracking.

The most recent example that wowed us is a market research company that, prior to using Mediatoolkit, had to spend two months of their projects creating a hypothesis about the markets they are researching. After implementing Mediatoolkit, that process took only two days.

Cases like this are the ones that continue to push us to deliver relevant and timely information to help our clients make better business decisions.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change in the next 5-10 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

It’s not news that the amount of data available on the internet grows exponentially. Companies have been going digital for years now, with the recent pandemic pushing this trend further. With these two factors combined, the ability to track and monitor online media is becoming crucial to big brands and smaller businesses wanting to expand their business and deliver exceptional customer experiences.

Additionally, the industry has focused solely on the coverage and getting more and more sources and data. The situation is shifting; we should all focus on interpreting the data and enabling customers to make data-driven decisions. The ones that will succeed in the future will develop technology that understands data as humans do while being able to analyse what is relevant and what can make a lasting impact on the business.

By Peter Appleby

“Content is king, but video content is God”

Vladimir Petkov

Interview with Vladimir Petkov, Chief Data Officer of Updata One and CEO of Identrics in Bulgaria.

Hi Vladimir, Updata One is a newly formed community. What companies are included and what are the main purposes of the community?

The four companies that make up the Updata One community (A Data Pro, Identrics, SeeNews and Perceptica), have a variety of expertise and knowledge. Though they’re different companies, they operate in the very same knowledge-intensive industry and this makes the relationship between them beneficial and essential at many levels while allowing each company to build valuable partnerships with the others.

We have many examples of the group’s collaboration in order to answer a specific customer request or perform internal process optimisation. This collaboration leads to an increase of expertise within the community of professionals and provides an opportunity to deliver better products and services to current and potential clients.

What is your background and what is included in your current role as Chief Data Officer at Updata One?

Almost all of my professional path has been related to data and innovation. I have six years of experience in digital media and business development, gained at Economedia, Bulgaria’s top news publisher. After that, I continued my journey as CTO at A Data Pro, a global company specialising in content, data and business intelligence services. Since 2016, I have been CEO at Identrics, and now I am also Chief Data Officer at the newly established business community of Updata One.

In this role, I am responsible for data. I oversee the effectiveness of processes such as data collection, management and transformations and find ways to improve them. In addition, I pay attention to the development of the market we are operating in and find ways to innovate and implement automation.

Outside my professional life, I am a podcast producer and host and deliver lectures on online business and digital media-related topics at various universities.

You are also the CEO of Identrics where you provide automated abstractive summarisation. Can you explain why that is important for media intelligence?

Abstractive summarisation is a solution we launched recently. The media intelligence industry is in constant search for better solutions of content aggregation, transformation and analysis, and we can all agree that we witnessed the rise of a phenomenon during the pandemic – the infodemic.

Nowadays it is even hard for communications experts to know everything about the organisation they are responsible for and respond to the emerging crisis in the fastest possible way.

These problems need the development of new technologies to help media intelligence company deal with the heavy load of information and improve its process, so they can meet the need for accurate, immediate delivery of news resumes.

Abstract summaries are tough and necessitate significant language modelling. It’s also usually more difficult than extractive summarisation. The information in a text is interpreted by abstractive summarisation, which generates new sentences for the summary. It’s pretty similar to how long text summaries are written. This method differs from prior versions of summarisation, which used input sentences to construct shorter texts. To develop human-like summaries, Identrics’ solution employs AI and Machine Learning.

However, there are certain difficulties in creating a new text. One such issue is that abstractive summarisation algorithms can sometimes produce erroneous data. For this reason, Identrics uses a fact-checking method to address this issue.

How will abstractive summarisation affect copyright, and do you see any challenge in relation to copyright owners?

Abstractive summarisation approaches provide outlines that are easily understood and short. They reduce the length of sentences, resulting in reduced recurrence of tasks.

Because abstractive summaries are wholly new texts, they can assist firms to avoid copywriting challenges. This helps save money and time.

Have you recently, or do you plan to, release any new technology-based solutions in 2022 that will add to or improve the services you offer your clients?

We are planning to launch various solutions this year, starting with entity-based abstractive summarisation.

A project we have been working on in the past months is our Enterprise Knowledge Graph, which will allow us to solve complex problems such as entity resolution and entity linking. It will help Identrics create deep reports and include non-obvious knowledge.

Another development is our model for fake news and hate speech detection. These types of solutions are essential in a world where everyone has the freedom to share their own or another person’s opinion, and the information is spreading at a fast speed.

When it comes to the actual data behind media intelligence, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

There is always room for additional development and improvement.

Social media is a game-changer for sure, but there are also other emerging communication channels. A lot of podcasts are generating content that could be of interest to business decision-makers and PR experts.

Also, we all know that content is king, but video content is God. There are more and more videos spreading across the internet that carry a variety of information with them. Communicational experts need additional instruments to better explore the information in all types of media.

Can the entire process of media intelligence be automated in the future?

Many tasks can be automated with the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning models. The truth is, though, that technology is still not mature enough to replace people. In my opinion, there will not be full automation in any industry in the following decades.

Automation is not everything when it comes to media monitoring. While automation saves the analyst a great deal of time, it cannot handle everything. Analysts that track media must also consider their opinion, or whether an article’s or a social media post’s tone is good, neutral, or pessimistic.

What excites you the most when it comes to automation in the media intelligence industry in the future?

The emergence of new communication channels brings the need for fast development in the media intelligence industry. Think about it: 10 years ago not so many people owned a smartphone, social media didn’t control our world and nobody had even thought of podcasts.

Now we have to deal with new copywriting issues, and the boom of fake news and hate speech. Addressing all of these problems and looking for a way to solve them is something that I am really passionate about.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change in the next 5-10 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

The media intelligence industry needs to change with the pace that media in general is doing. The term “media” has transformed dramatically in the past several years. Today, everybody can be media, and everybody can spread the news around its network.

I think we will have to invest even more in R&D initiatives and find new ways to monitor all the conversations that are happening around the net, around the globe.

By Peter Appleby

“You need to be on top of new technologies to make your business as efficient and valuable as possible”

Thomas Vejlemand

Interview with Thomas Vejlemand, President of FIBEP and CEO of Infomedia, a media intelligence company from Denmark.

Hi Thomas, what is your background and what is included in your current role at Infomedia?

I joined Infomedia seven years ago. Back in 2015 Infomedia had its activities only in Denmark. Today, Infomedia has 250 employees in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Estonia, and London. In 2018 Infomedia acquired Opoint, a technology platform for crawling of global online news content.

I am Infomedia Group CEO and chairman of Opoint. I have a background as an engineer with a good sense of business and technology. In the last 20 years I have had CEO roles in digital agencies and information management companies combined with roles as a board member in tech startups. In November 2021 I became president for FIBEP, an industry organisation for media intelligence companies.

What differentiates Infomedia from other media intelligence companies?

We are one of the leading media intelligence companies in the Nordic region. We serve major brands and organizations with global communication insights. Our strong integrated global media coverage across print, web, broadcast and social is a big asset. The ownership of Opoint also gives us business opportunities serving industries with aggregated online news content. We are unique as we are owned by the two largest publishers in Scandinavia that require that we are at the forefront of copyright and re-distribution. We strongly believe that this enables Infomedia, Opoint and clients to put their focus elsewhere. We focus on value selling rather than product selling, and we believe in strong partnerships and networking with our clients. It’s a lot about culture and people skills as well.

What are your greatest challenges ahead at Infomedia when it comes to serving your customers and developing your offer?

Digital transformation of our business has been a major focus for several years and will still be. The media intelligence industry is changing and you need to be on top of new technologies to make your business as efficient and valuable as possible. It’s about serving your customers with communication insights and pinpointing business impact. During my time with Infomedia, I’ve focused on breaking down communication silos, thus equalising blogs, social media with traditional media. We are now closing in on this narrative. It’s becoming a data driven industry where you need to afford investments in technology, data science and analytical competencies.

In 2019 Infomedia acquired M-Brains activities in Sweden and Norway. In hindsight, how has that acquisition affected the Infomedia offering?

The acquisition of M-Brain brought us into new markets. We got critical mass and scale in our business and thereby the ability to further invest in products, services, technology and in our people. We now have a more client segmented offering with clear value propositions supporting needs for real time insights for crisis management, brand and reputation insights, market and competitor insights and communication efficiency insights.

What is the focus for Infomedia in 2022 and how will you get there?

We want to further consolidate and develop our position in the Nordic region within media intelligence and communication insights. We want to position Infomedia and Opoint for new buying centers. PR/Communication is our target customer group but we believe media and communication insights are of value for marketing, business development and sales as well. It’s about the retargeting of insights and our new product platform suits this. We would very much like to contribute with analytical services enlightening the climate and sustainability agenda as well.

When it comes to the actual data behind media intelligence, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

The answer, as always, lies with the client. We have seen a shift in behaviour of media consumption, ensuring more focus on metadata and raw data rather than focusing on data types or media silos. Media data is recognised as being a leading indicator in many industries and our clients benefit from that. We work with multiple data sources: panel data, CRM, and market data to name a few. So the overall trend is related to how we enable client behaviour and ensure that we can correlate data to give them business critical insights across their data and needs.

You were recently elected President of FIBEP, The Media Intelligence Association. What are the greatest challenges for FIBEP as an organisation when it comes to supporting its members?

The greatest challenge is to become even more relevant for media intelligence companies across continents. We have to face a more differentiated need from members including global, regional and local companies as well as we have to welcome a broader number of new data and technology companies with the opportunity for networking and partnerships. FIBEP was founded around a very strong networking community. Clearly COVID-19 impacted the way of networking and interacting. We have to innovate and develop a hybrid model for a global industry organization.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change in the next five years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

I’m optimistic and believe our industry will have further growth opportunities. Delivering media analytics and communication insights is of strategic importance in a world with a more complex media landscape – not to mention a world being impacted by fake news and manipulation. The flipside of this is of course the ability to access media content, both editorial and social content. Understanding copyright legislation and dealing with media, platforms and influencers is key.

How would you like to see FIBEP develop over the next five years?

I would like to see a more diversified list of media intelligence companies from across continents. I would like as well to see FIBEP develop its ecosystem and network with selected universities and research organizations in order to position our industry supported by new innovation and science. We need to embrace networking with other industry organizations as well, within PR/communication, marketing and technology.

By Peter Appleby

“The key to social media analysis is being able to rank information in the most relevant manner”

Alexander Polonsky

Interview with Alexander Polonsky, Co-founder and VP R&D of Bloom Social Analytics, a social media analytics company in France.

Hi Alexander, what is your background and what is included in your current role at Bloom?

My background is in Neuroscience. I have a Phd in Neuroscience and a Master’s in Applied Mathematics, and I have been working in information and analysis management for the past 20 years.

At Bloom, I research. More specifically, I research algorithm design, in order to design algorithms to analyse the social media data that we collect. The process of design is a scientific process in which we define hypotheses about how we would go about solving business problems. We then create those models and options in order to test them, before refining and iterating based on the test results we receive from testing. We do this until we reach a satisfactory performance.

What differentiates Bloom from other social media analytics companies?

Our positioning is very different and we’re unlike other social media analysis companies in the sense that we focus on the quality and relevance of analysis over the speed of analysis and the spread of source coverage. We cover fewer sources but do so in far greater depth. We cover only Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Weibo, WeChat and TikTok.

Gaining access to data is challenging, but in addition there are challenges to analysis. When trying to access data via search queries there can be all sorts of problems, particularly if the intention is to statistically analyse the results of the search. Algorithmic issues must be solved, such as detecting the noise, completing the query, and detecting content that is relevant but not easily tracked with keywords. Bloom is really the only company to address these issues adequately, using powerful automated query modelling assistance. Our classification approach to data allows us to go beyond keywords.

There are two key points we stress in terms of analysis of data. One is the quality of our mathematical analysis. There are many companies that analyse social media data very superficially, and the majority of companies commit grave mathematical errors in their analysis by treating different sources as though they were the same, or using a trend calculation that is not really a trend, or performing sentiment analysis very poorly.

The other is that we analyse data in a way that goes beyond our competitors’ abilities. We analyse positions, not just sentiment. We also analyse emotions, and we have developed unique models of information importance. The key to social media analysis is being able to rank information in the most relevant manner, and counting different types of engagements in the same manner is a huge oversimplification.

What are your greatest challenges ahead at Bloom, when it comes to serving your customers and developing your offer?

Data access remains a major challenge for all players in the space because platforms are not predisposed to sharing. On one hand, this is understandable. On the other hand, it’s short-sighted. Twitter has shown it can be a major part of a business model, and importantly, if companies feel that they cannot see what is really happening on a social media platform from the outside and verify information for themselves, it becomes harder and harder to trust platforms that are charging for advertisements.

So far Bloom has not focused on real-time analysis. We prefer to take our time and analyse thoroughly to provide deep insights and strategic recommendations. But more and more our clients are asking us for real-time updates. We will now focus on developing this side of our offering.

We have invested heavily into our investigation capacities but we also want to develop our alerting capacities.

When it comes to the actual data behind the analytics you do, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

Access to some of the platforms is getting harder and so the best practice is to diversify and increase source coverage. We are continuously integrating new sources, but when integrating we do so in a way that goes far further than most competitors. Being able to access data on a platform can have many different levels – what exactly a company is able to access is key to its abilities.

You have recently launched a partnership with Dassault Systèmes. How will that partnership affect Bloom moving forward?

The partnership opens up a whole new sector for us: product design. We’ve already worked a little in this area for previous clients but the Dassault Systèmes partnership is a strategic alliance to launch a new offer because the main clients of Dassault Systèmes are those designing and managing different products, for example, in the transportation industry. We will be feeding these clients with strategic insights about market trends, consumer behaviour and similar information.

How do you think the social media intelligence industry will change in the next 5-10 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

Challenges to data access will certainly remain but we’re seeing new social media platforms spring up all the time, and not all of them are bought by the majors right away. This means there is a high diversity of players. Keeping up with them all will not be easy but may be easier than gaining information from some of the traditional major platforms.

Another challenge is proving the new use cases that companies are presenting. Social media analysis has addressed only part of the large number use cases it could work for. While new use cases are still to be proven, this trend of moving the industry beyond marketing and communications will continue. Our partnership with Dassault Systèmes is an example of that.

I hope that the industry will mature. At the moment it is somewhat of a Wild West and grand claims are made that are not then backed up. Clients do not generally have sufficient expertise to be able to judge the relevance of one solution over another, so hopefully we will see some standards emerge. We’re still far from that at the moment.

Can you please give an example of some surprising findings from your analytics that made a significant impact for a customer?

We worked for one company in the bottled water market. They had been putting a lot of effort into the recycling of their bottles, but we helped them realise that the consumers did not trust recycling. Indeed, consumers really wanted the re-use of plastics and the abolishing of single-use plastic. This difference struck at the core of the strategy for this large company.

We worked for another client in the prepared food industry where many companies are looking to migrate from plastic to aluminium packaging. We discovered that there is a growing weak signal of alarm about the health risks of aluminium packaging. In that sense, they may have been moving from the rock to the hard place.

By Peter Appleby

“The market for media intelligence platform solutions is already highly saturated”

Raina Lazarova

Interview with Raina Lazarova, Co-founder and COO of Ruepoint, a global media intelligence company.

Hi Raina, what is your background and what is included in your role at Ruepoint?

I have spent the last 10 years in the media intelligence space, first at Precise Media Group (UK) followed by a stint as Global Services Director at Kantar Media’s Reputation Intelligence business in the UK where I oversaw international customers and key vendors.

Prior to joining Precise, I was involved in the Business Information and Knowledge Process Outsourcing sectors, working with global companies such as Thomson Reuters, Dow Jones Factiva, LexisNexis, EBSCO.

In 2017, I became one of the founding members and COO of Ruepoint, a global media intelligence business with offices in Ireland, the UK and Bulgaria.

What differentiates Ruepoint from other media intelligence companies?

Undoubtedly, our biggest asset and differentiator is our team. We are very fortunate to have surrounded ourselves with skilled, motivated and passionate people who continue to surprise us every day with their creativity and exceptional effort.

Ruepoint caters for the needs of those customers in the market who need a “white-glove”, fully managed media intelligence service, typically combining media content from a variety of geographies and languages, and therefore requiring a blend of high-touch, multilingual skills, strong domain expertise and capable technology. The services we deliver are typically used by PR and communications teams, the C-suite and other key business stakeholders.

Increasingly, Ruepoint is working on cross-functional requirements, integrating data and seeking to draw insights from a wide variety of data sets from paid, earned, social and owned media, through market research and consumer insights, point-of-sale, and other business data. Customer expectations are constantly rising, and in all fairness, we are deliberately driving this change, as it gives us the opportunity to differentiate ourselves as thought leaders and drivers of change, delivering true value to our customers.

What are your greatest challenges ahead at Ruepoint when it comes to serving your customers and developing your services?

Historically, one of the biggest challenges in our industry has been the commoditisation of the media monitoring market. It is the part of the business that is typically characterised by higher margins, which have been eroded in recent years due to pressure from SaaS providers, promising to deliver the same value at a fraction of the price.

Ruepoint’s response to this trend has been to focus on what we are best at – delivering a high-touch editorial and analysis service, leveraging domain expertise in key industries, coupled with a consultative approach to media measurement.

Do you plan to release any new solutions that will add to or improve the services you offer clients?

We constantly strive to improve the services we offer to customers by listening to what they tell us every day. Often, that involves very specific problems that require custom solutions. We bring in experts from across the organisations, from source management, through editors and analysts, to account managers to build a multi-faceted solution that answers those needs.

All customers come with different levels of knowledge. What are the most common misconceptions that your current and potential clients have regarding what media intelligence can give them?

We treat each customer with full respect, constantly trying to provide thought leadership and best practice to help PR and communications teams excel in their job and deliver demonstrable results to their organisations. We recognise businesses operate in wildly different competitive environments that largely define their communications objectives.

At the same time, I believe that demand is a function of supply and in markets where we see misconceptions about the value of media intelligence it is largely due to the services available to that market. To address a common misconception about media measurement specifically in our home market of Ireland, for example, we have invested heavily in educating the market about the value of integrated measurement in the last four years.

When it comes to the actual data behind the media intelligence you do, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

As a sector, we need to constantly keep our finger on the pulse of any emerging media and data sources. I expect that private, subscription-based networks and formats such as Patreon and Substack will present the biggest challenge to the industry in the near future. Increasingly, content creators are looking for revenue generating models by publishing their work – podcasts, newsletters etc – to a very targeted audience prepared to pay for this content. How we as an industry go about monitoring these networks will be very interesting to see.

What in this industry has surprised you the most over the years?

It has been fascinating to watch the industry move from a largely “scissors and glue” operating model 10-15 years ago to a technology-driven sector using the latest cloud native infrastructure and AI technology. At the same time, customer requirements, very much helped by the efforts of industry thought leaders and AMEC, have evolved from number crunching to seeking to prove true business value. This has been an incredible journey to take part in for Ruepoint and me personally.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change in the next 5-10 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

If you had asked the same question 10 years ago, the biggest fear of the industry was the “inevitable” demise of print media with the rise of digital and social. That clearly didn’t happen, which only comes to prove how wrong we can be in our predictions.

I think AI will be increasingly used to aid the human analysis of big data sets, but without replacing the need for cognitive intervention.

A challenge the industry is already facing is the pressure to deliver revenue growth at healthy margins from managed monitoring and evaluation services. I understand why the SaaS model is attractive to shareholders, but I think the market for platform solutions is already highly saturated. Ruepoint is focused on leveraging a mix of high-skilled editorial resources and proprietary tech to deliver the best value-for-money services to customers where and when they matter.

By Peter Appleby

“The anonymity of social data is a debate that’s not going away”

Ryszard Bublik

Interview with Ryszard Bublik, CEO of Social360, a media monitoring company in the UK.

Hi Ryszard, what is your background, and what is included in your current role at Social360?

I started my career in investment banking before moving into the communications industry, learning my trade at global critical issues management firm Brunswick Group. From there, I co-founded the boutique tech PR agency Parys Communications with business partner Patrick Herridge. While at Parys, we recognised a lack of quality social media listening tools for corporate communications teams, so we set out to build our own, and Social360 was born. That was more than a decade ago.

As I look back on it, the most rewarding and exciting part was building our technology platform from the ground up and applying the product to help industry professionals strengthen their craft – many of whom I knew personally from my days as a PR practitioner.

Now we have a successful business with a highly-experienced team based around the world, from Rio de Janeiro to New York to London to Melbourne – even Oakhampton in Devon, the home of our main tech hub. My role is to ensure the business moves forward, understanding our client’s issues and how we can help solve them. I have a senior management team around me who makes sure the company is running efficiently. The issues and requirements of our clients are constantly changing; our mission is to stay ahead of them and be a partner in their success.

What differentiates Social360 from other media monitoring companies?

We approach client relationships as a partnership and work from the belief that one size does not fit all. The needs and issues of our clients can be different each time. We work with our clients to develop and understand what they’re facing and deliver a solution that works for them. We do the heavy lifting and deliver relevant, actionable results.

We have been looking at social data for a very long time, and so our machine learning algorithms are based on more than a decade’s worth of human analysed data. That means that our models are based on one of the largest historical data sets available, which is the secret (not-so-secret) sauce from which our clients benefit.

The social media universe is vast and constantly growing; finding what you need to know from a reputational perspective is a mighty challenge. Brand trend data is the easy part, but finding information that would impact a company’s reputation is a different issue. That’s where we step in – we are the first and probably only social media listening business that focuses on reputation and risk management. With our powerful machine learning algorithms combined with our human analysts, we can deliver output that our customers can put to work immediately. We do the searching and data synthesis using human analysis so our clients can focus on the outcomes needed, not on getting the right data.

What are your greatest challenges ahead at Social 360, when it comes to serving your customers and developing your service offering?

Access to high-quality data is always supercritical. Our clients don’t ever want to be caught on the back foot, so we strive to be an early warning system, spotting the reputational issues before they emerge. We work very hard to ensure that the raw uncategorised data we collect is as complete as possible but, more importantly, as relevant as possible. We believe our search and categorisation technology sets us apart.

Have you recently, or do you plan to, release any new technology-based solutions that will add to or improve the services you offer your clients?

Social360 was built on our own technology platforms – back end to front end. That was primarily because off-the-shelf products were fixed in format and never had the depth of search we needed. As a result, we have always been able to stay ahead of the market and adapt to our customers’ needs by developing and implementing technology improvements as needed. We are now moving to deliver bespoke Enterprise solutions that in some cases include data beyond social data, such as regulatory data. Our search and categorisation technology can be applied to many different types of data sets, which means we can offer a bespoke solution to corporates. Rather than a corporate buying multiple other platforms to look at different data sets and then only using 10% of the functionality of each platform, we can build a bespoke platform that has the right functionality the business needs.

The other big technology rollout we are planning is using our machine learning algorithms to automate risk identification on social media. We have seen tremendous growth for our social due diligence product, where we look at the social media footprint of organisations and individuals. We believe our algorithms will allow some automation of that process and, as such, become a true risk identification engine.

All customers come with a different level of knowledge. What are the most common misconceptions your current and potential clients have regarding what media monitoring can give them?

With the proliferation of monitoring businesses banging the AI drum, some clients are led to believe that AI-led companies can somehow predict the future! Perhaps one day, but the technology isn’t there yet. AI engines definitely help dramatically filter down data; however, the last mile still requires human interpretation of that data. We focus on delivering the output that matters to our clients, not necessarily the latest technology buzzword.

Talking to one of our clients recently, they believe that no system, dashboard, or AI is 100% right all of the time. While that may be true, we think that we can significantly reduce the error rate with augmented human input and thus, in turn, train the machines to be more accurate in the future. This is a process, and we are at the beginning of it, not the end.

When it comes to the actual data behind the media monitoring you do, what kind of data or media not currently used can be interesting in the future?

The platforms we are always asked about are peer-to-peer chat applications like Whatsapp or Snapchat. By its very nature, that data is encrypted and only available to those who are part of the conversation. Those data sources would be interesting for our clients; however, they are private conversations, so I don’t expect access to that data any time soon. It would be like placing a listening device at a dinner party in someone’s home – not a path any company should be going down.

Privacy around the use of social data is an emerging challenge. How do you think that will affect the media intelligence industry?

It is an issue, however, organisations and pressure groups will always want their voices heard, so there will always be an element of social data in the public domain. We as an industry need to ensure we know and understand the boundaries we operate in and, as such, deliver social data that is being shared publicly. The anonymity of social data is a debate that’s not going away. That debate is very mainstream now as questions are continually raised following online abuse on Twitter and other platforms – should that privacy and anonymity now be dropped? It’s a question that raises other questions around controls, freedom of speech and others.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change in the next 5-10 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

I think the convergence of traditional media and social media will only accelerate, and as an industry, we need to be working harder to integrate the two better. For me, it still feels like the two are treated in silos, and that needs to change. It will be challenging,

By Peter Appleby

“Media monitoring is the key to optimizing brand communication”

Robert Stalmach

Interview with Robert Stalmach, CEO of Newspoint, a media monitoring company in Poland.

Hi Robert, how have brands’ media monitoring needs changed since the social media revolution?

Diametrically. Social media has become a key communication channel for brands. Today, the internet is largely user-generated content. 2/3 of internet users consider the opinions of other internet users to be very important and consider them in their purchasing decisions. These phenomena are changing the way brands communicate with their recipients. Users are distrustful of information obtained from brands. They prefer to be guided by the suggestions of people they trust.

Therefore, since marketing budgets are transferred to social platforms, media monitoring must also focus on this area of data. Most companies already know that they cannot afford to ignore opinions about their brands on the internet, especially on social media. It took just a few serious communication crises for brands to realize the need for constant monitoring of social media. The growing popularity of social media translates into a rapid increase in data. This creates new analytical needs. There is a growing need for information analysis – observation and aggregation are not enough.

What are the expectations of Newspoint customers?

Very varied; each has different business needs and goals. We provide comprehensive, global media monitoring and influencer analytics services. We offer data from 75 languages and 170 markets. We structure this information and present it to our clients as a useful source of knowledge. We provide tools that enable clients to gain an information advantage, e.g. in managing communication strategies or responding to image crises. We help our clients to interact with users of various types of media, analyze data and draw conclusions from it.

Therefore, the expectations of our clients are expressed through diversified goals, the achievement of which is possible thanks to the analysis of data from media monitoring. The elements of the process include obtaining information from various sources, structuring the collected data, and drawing management conclusions.

What less obvious new ways are there for brands to use media monitoring data?

New applications go hand in hand with market trends. In the increasingly demanding labor market, using media monitoring in employer branding activities is gaining popularity. Changes in the allocation of marketing budgets thus increase the need to analyze the effectiveness of influencer marketing and the match of opinion leaders in different segments.

Thanks to media monitoring, many brands want to capture information about trends that can be translated into products sold in stores. For example, house developers consider the results of online opinion analysis when making decisions about the location and facilities of housing estates.

In addition, the importance of tools such as ours in capturing sales leads is growing. Companies from industries such as financial, insurance and transport services use media monitoring directly to reach potential customers.

How crucial is fast access to data in media monitoring?

Fast access to data is crucial in a world of incredible growth rates. The current pace of content growth is never seen before in history. When communication gains such a tremendous pace, the timing of data sharing is crucial. This is a huge challenge and task for us as a company whose goal is to provide the most advanced tools for monitoring, research, and media analysis. The speed of reaction to the content appearing on the Internet is a key factor in creating the information advantage of brands, and customers appreciate not only the speed of access to data but also its quick and professional analysis.

One expectation of our clients is to monitor the content in real-time or with a minimum delay concerning the time of publication. Therefore, ensuring the stability, efficiency, and scalability of IT systems in an environment needing to index billions of documents is, on the one hand, a technological challenge and, on the other, a potential competitive advantage of those companies that do it well.

What directions of development for the future do you see for Newspoint?

Above all, continuously developing our automated media monitoring and online analytics tools. Our goal is to ensure the best possible data quality (accuracy and number of results) and provide multi-dimensional analyses useful for marketers, PR, HR, and sales managers. This requires very advanced technology.

Brands, looking for new ways to focus the attention of consumers, focused on communicating with them through network opinion leaders – influencers. Therefore, they need tools that can comprehensively analyze the value of their communication with recipients by influencers on various platforms, in any language, and with the lowest possible delay. They should also support brand communication with potential influencers and facilitate measuring the effects of cooperation between the brand and the person promoting it.

Collecting huge amounts of data is no longer enough today. The challenge is to correctly classify, analyze, process, and interpret. So, more than ever, there is a need for end-to-end analytical solutions to answer the question “why?” And not just “what?”. In influencer marketing – solutions that can compare the impact of influencer cooperation on the perception of the brand in the target group with the costs of such cooperation.

“The concept that we are the product is scary and foreign to most people”

Jim Reynolds

Interview with Jim Reynolds, Senior Director at Pulsar Platform, a social media intelligence company based in the UK.

Hi Jim, what is your background and what is included in your current role at Pulsar Platform?

I currently lead Partnerships and Alliances at Pulsar Platform, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Access Intelligence PLC.

My role focuses on all things that encompass partnerships, from data partnerships overlooking vendors including Twingly and Twitter, to fully understanding how social media can be used and utilised in the social analytics media monitoring and measurement space.

I also look after technology partnerships, focusing my energies around deciding how we interpret and understand data that comes into the Pulsar platform, and how we can create more value from data that has been augmented to our partners. I also look at indirect data, whether that be a reseller, partner or consultancy, and reach an understanding of the business viability of that partnership.

I’m the subject matter expert within the organisation, understanding the grander ecosystem and how social analytics clings with customer care and publishing, or developing a complete ecosystem.

What differentiates Pulsar Platform?

When we look at the rest of the social analytics ecosystem, what really differentiates us is the new, fresh view we have on data. Most of the other companies in this space are ten to 12 years old. Most provide services whereby they count interactions or clicks on a post and provide a basic form of sediment analysis.

Pulsar, in contrast, looks at data from a different cohort. Rather than looking at keywords and counting interactions, we strive to understand the audience or panel that are discussing something. We then start to map out what the behaviour of that something is. We ask about the personas interacting with content and the network that is driving interactions so that we can in turn drive truly valuable insight rather than just being another keyword counter.

What are the greatest challenges ahead for Pulsar when it comes to serving customers?

Our customers are inundated with content and information. We strive to explain to our customers that it is beneficial to them to evangelise us rather than consider us as just another social media monitoring company. This is tough to do considering the complexity of the field, and the level of competition found within it.

Ensuring that all users in the space get insights from the datasets they’re contracting is another challenge. We need to make sure our customers have that access to information and that they know we are doing something special with it.

How may changes in privacy law changes impact the industry?

Facebook, the issues that emerged with Cambridge Analytica and Twitter’s varying approaches to privacy, as well as the limited access to its platform, have put a lens on an industry that was already opaque when it comes to privacy.

Compliance is interesting. Press, media and broadcast monitoring have existed, in some form, for hundreds of years at this point. Regulation and compliance will always lag behind market adoption. We’re now at an intersection. We love the simplicity of carrying a cell phone but the concept that we are the product is scary and foreign to most people. Regulation will catch up eventually.

But when we think about the value of this data for the owner of this data and the broadcaster that will share it, we see the increase in privacy laws as part of a natural curve. Markets learn the value of understanding how audiences, peers or constituents think and most people are fine with data collection as long as it is done in an ethical and transparent way. Where it gets creepy is when content is being manipulated or opinions changed. Networks have not done a good enough job at being transparent and we as the vendors need to do a better job of speaking up too.

Does Pulsar Platform have any new technologies it intends to release into the market soon?

We have continued to be an innovator in the market and are very proud of being first to market with datasets like TikTok and Pinterest. We’re going to continue that trend.

Of course I’d love to share sneak peeks of what we’re doing next but I’m sworn to secrecy! But the areas we’re focused on are continuing to share additional network datasets, so that when looking at the core of a problem – like which audiences are sharing which information – those insights can surface faster to drive decisions. Augmenting AI-based analysis to onboard additional partners will also be a focal point.

Which of the services you offer do you think are under-utilised by clients?

Education of users is difficult. I’ve yet to see a product manager in the industry that doesn’t want their data utilised in a better way by their customers.

On our side, the more we can educate our users to understand the intersection of content and the shareability of content, whether that be a network view, data thematics streams or emotional analysis, the better. I understand how difficult it is for users, and every single customer base of every single platform has users underutilising features. If I was to be selfish, I’d like more folks to know about the power of network analysis and how information spreads through nodes.

How do you predict the social media intelligence industry will change in five years time?

Now that I’ve been in the industry for 12 years, the single greatest challenge that I do not see changing is data accessibility. There will always be a new network emerging, or more private networks but data access will vary. Countries that have strong control over data access like in regions in the Pacific – if China does not want a consumer accessing a dataset they just turn it off – will continue to be a challenge. This can be hard to explain to Global 2000 organisation: it isn’t the same as negotiating with a company.

But when we talk about change, the things that get me excited are areas like the consumption of digital assets. We’re on the cusp of something really exciting considering the changes that have occurred during the pandemic. The world is now digital first for all things. Remote work is here to stay and users will continue to share. The more vendors like ourselves expand into digital measurement, digital understanding and looking at the full ecosystem, the more the lens of what we review will expand. As users become more aware that companies are sucking information out of them, we will move further towards observational sciences.

By Peter Appleby

“The real winners will be the companies that not only cope with massive data pools but can also measure the real impact”

Vilūnė Kairienė

Interview with Vilūnė Kairienė, Head of Monitoring and Analysis at Mediaskopas, a media monitoring company in the Baltics.

Hi Vilūnė, what is your background and what is included in your current role at Mediaskopas?

Interestingly, Mediaskopas is my first ever job. Back in 2007, I started to look for some additional work while I was studying Philology (I was a 19 year old student at the time) and found that Mediaskopas was looking for a media intelligence specialist: the role sounded really interesting to me! I passed the tests and there I was, at the beginning of my journey into the media intelligence ocean, which has lasted almost 15 years up to now.

Over time, I’ve been promoted through different roles and now I’m here as Head of Analytics and Data Solutions. It’s a position that is perfect for me, I really cannot imagine a better fit.

My current position includes not only managing a team of data analytics experts, but also ensuring that our managers and team members are working toward a common goal. The most important part of my job is to convert insights into strategic opportunities for our company – I work closely with leaders across departments to support and implement high-quality, data-driven decisions.

What differentiates Mediaskopas from other media intelligence companies?

I think that the Mediaskopas’s primary strength is its people. The company is ready for its clients 24/7, and this is vital because crises never arrive at convenient moments, especially in the PR field. The second thing that makes Mediaskopas a leading media intelligence services choice is our AI-powered system allows us to create different products for each client that are tailored to every need and which makes each and every communication process easier.

Mediaskopas is a part of the Baltic Media Monitoring Group (BMMG), which operates in Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. What are the greatest challenges to offer comprehensive products and services throughout the different countries?

The Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia) are not big countries, but they are really different. Different markets and varying customers’ needs mean that we always need to be a few steps ahead of our competitors. But this requirement makes us stronger. In most cases, we have the tools and products customers need available before they even ask for them.

Have you recently, or are you about to release any new technology-based solutions that will add to or improve services you offer your clients?

Working on new technologies is a never ending process in BMMG companies. While I can’t give any specific details, I can say that up to five new solutions are being developed as we speak and that automated intelligence and machine learning are everyday parts of what we do.

All customers come with different levels of knowledge. What challenges do you face when it comes to onboarding new customers for media intelligence?

As we are working in an environment that changes each and every day, our onboarding and all other customer service processes are based on providing exceptional and appropriate care and assistance. The biggest challenge, I would say, is to prove to every new client that we can indeed provide everything we say we can and that “everything is possible”.

Is there any aspect of your platform that you believe has great potential but has not been fully embraced by your clients yet?

Our platform has allowed our customers to reach back into and use the full media archive for years. I think it’s a real treasure, but it also requires time and effort to dig into. Of course, time is money, so it is usually only our analysts who are digging into the archive.

Privacy around the use of social data is an emerging challenge. How do you think that will affect the media intelligence industry?

We are covering all possible types of media at the moment: print, online, news wires, radio, TV and social.

The biggest challenge these days is indeed social media and its privacy issues. We do see a growing interest in it, but the social media pool is so big that even our customers, who work with social media on a daily basis, are unsure where to start and what the metrics are that they should actually monitor. They ask themselves questions like whether covering Facebook alone is enough, or if they should also be working with TikTok.

The real winners will be the companies that not only cope with massive data pools but can also measure the real impact of each and every post, video, and link.

How do you think the media intelligence industry will change over the next 5 years, and what are the greatest challenges ahead?

As media is changing really fast – the impact of print is falling drastically while online is increasing – media intelligence companies will need to change as well. I see a big change from where the industry is today compared to 15, 5 or even 2 years ago.

More recently, COVID-19 has had a major impact. Now it seems that everyone and everything is online, so media intelligence companies must be the first ones to gather all that information, digest it and present conclusions in real time. The last quarter is history to learn from, but not to be working with.

By Peter Appleby

“The communication and PR industry stands at a crossroads”

Richard Bagnall

Interview with Richard Bagnall, co-managing partner of CARMA and Chairman of AMEC, the International Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication.

Hi Richard, what is your background and what is included in your current roles at CARMA and AMEC?

I began my career as a PR and communications professional and fell into measurement by chance, joining the founder of a new company, Metrica, in the mid ‘90s. I was brought in to grow the business and, over a process of 15 years, it developed into the world’s largest comms measurement business of its day. In 2009, the company was bought by a private equity firm and together with Durrants, Gorkana and Metrica, we merged to form the Gorkana Group. I ran global measurement and evaluation for four years before leaving to become PRIME Research’s UK CEO and SVP of Europe.

Three years ago, I joined long time industry friend and colleague Mazen Nahawi at CARMA as the global co-managing partner and the CEO of our European and Americas business. I have P&L responsibilities for these businesses while also consulting with our clients on tailored evaluation services to provide meaningful PR measurement. Our approach is to attract the world’s most experienced team of measurement and evaluation consultants, which when combined with the great tech on which our services are built, makes CARMA what we believe to be the strongest PR measurement company in the world.

On top of this, I have been the Chair of AMEC for almost six years now. My role at AMEC focuses on industry best practice, ongoing education and ensuring a common and consistent approach all around the world. For education to succeed, it is critical to have a common and consistent voice around the globe all singing from the same hymn sheet.

How does Carma differentiate itself from other media intelligence companies?

First, we are a truly global business and work on all major continents. Second, we are not owned by a private equity firm; we are predominantly privately-owned, including by the management team.

As an industry, there has been a rush driven by the influx of venture capital to focus on software-as-a-service (Saas) and platform-based solutions. This brings with it an emphasis on technology, tools and armies of sales teams. Our view is that PR and comms pros do not need yet more nuisance sales calls, pretty charts and dashboards! They need relevant experience, critical thinking, expertise, and world class service and support to help them make sense of the changing media and comms environment.

Great technology is a critical building block in the offering, but it must be used appropriately for what it is good at: it is excellent for massive number crunching and the lightning-fast heavy lifting of significant data sets, but it is not a solution to PR’s measurement challenges in itself. It has to be the servant, not our master. By their very nature, Saas dashboards tend to count what is easy to count, not measure what actually matters. To measure what matters requires tailoring against organisational and comms objectives, and measuring beyond activity to the actual effects that a communications programme delivered.

Our culture also allows us to stand out. Our teams in each geography are some of the brightest, most hard-working and enthusiastic that I have ever had the pleasure to work with. We support, train and educate our team constantly to ensure that we are all, always learning. This approach attracts the very best talent, and the clients too.

What are the challenges for the market ahead?

The major challenge the market faces is one of education and understanding. For too long, PR and communication evaluation has focused on media content evaluation and ‘output’ metrics. These alone only measure activity, not results, and the number on their own can be pretty meaningless – often the inflated ‘vanity’ metric of which we all hear. Worse than this is the concept of a single number to measure PR and comms. For some this was the appeal of AVEs, and some PRs are hoping that AMEC might create or endorse a new single metric to replace this discredited number. But a single number can never measure all the nuances of communication, nor can it provide relevance, context nor insight.

The global pandemic has accelerated the need for PR and comms pros to professionalise their approach to evaluation. We must point to the value that we create, not just count activity. Activity without benefit is just cost. CFOs across the world are stripping unnecessary costs out of budgets as they look to save money, preserve cash and shore up finances for the uncertainties that lie ahead.

To do this, PR teams must not run the risk of being seen as ‘busy fools’ embroiled only in tactics. It begins with a proper plan, aligning with organisational objectives, setting meaningful targets and KPIs, and then measuring beyond the outputs to showing how opinions have been changed, minds informed and advocacy developed, and then ultimately the organisational impact of the work done.

What are the most important aspects that AMEC provides the industry?

AMEC is the global, single, credible voice of best practice, an organisation that the world of comms can turn to for advice, guidance, case studies and education on all aspects of media intelligence and public relations measurement. Founded 25 years ago as a UK-based media evaluation trade association, it has grown into a global professional body covering all aspects of communication evaluation with almost 200 members in 86+ countries.

Since inception, AMEC has been known for its educational initiatives. The first of these were the Barcelona Principles which we launched in 2010. They are seven broad statements defining what comprises best practice. Think of them as a 30,000-foot view, principles that explain what you should and should not be doing from a measurement perspective. They have been iterated every five years since to make sure they are up to date and reflect latest thinking and media and comms trends.

The Integrated Evaluation Framework then takes the Barcelona Principles one step further by showing the way to operationalise the principles. I led the talented AMEC team that created the Framework. It incorporated experts from all areas of comms and evaluation, PR agencies, in-house practitioners, monitoring/evaluation agencies, and academia. All gave generously of their time and worked collaboratively together, one of AMEC’s core strengths.

The framework is based on something called Process Evaluation which is a standard approach used in other business disciplines to measure effectiveness and efficiency throughout organisations. It was important for AMEC to bring proven management performance measurement approaches to the world of communications evaluation, and not invent something that would lack credibility in the C Suite. It was also important that it would be easy to understand, provide advice and guidance and work for all organisations of whatever size and with whatever budget.

The Framework has been translated into 22 languages, is taught at universities and is globally acknowledged as best practice. Latest AMEC research shows it’s been used at over 2000 organisations around the world.

Where will the Barcelona Principles and Integrated Evaluation Framework be improved upon?

The Barcelona Principles were created in 2010 and have been revised and refreshed since then every five years, the most recent time being in 2020. We believe this to be the right cadence as the comms and media industries continue to evolve to ensure that they are up to date.

The Integrated Evaluation Framework, being based on process evaluation, is an approach or a methodology, not a tool or a metric. As such, there is not a lot within it to iterate, but we are focused on making it more and more accessible and approachable to organisations across the globe. We are focused then on more how-tos, case studies and educational support. This year for example we launched a raft of planning support materials, showing how and why proper PR planning is such a critical and integral part of measurement and evaluation, and where it fits within a measurement framework. For the coming year, our educational focus will be on a free online course showing how to apply the framework to your organisation.

Privacy around the use of social data is an emerging challenge. How do you think that will affect the media intelligence industry?

There will be a further decline in relevance and meaning for many of the old school output metrics that were the primary focus of evaluation for so long. Many of them are now just the vanity metrics of today, the ever-larger numbers that mean very little. Impressions, for example, are impossible to define accurately and cannot be thought of as anything much more than an index.

We have seen some evaluation vendors try to innovate and come up with cookie-based solutions to work out more accurate impression numbers. This sounds great as a concept but relying on cookie and ad-based tracking technologies has been hampered by privacy concerns and cookie and ad blocking software. My personal view is that the search for an ‘accurate’ number of people reached across the diverse media landscape is nigh on impossible. Instead of focusing on that, professionals should be looking to link the output metrics to the outtakes and outcomes that their organisation cares about.

I also see the automation side of the media intelligence sector declining in importance while AI is not yet suitably equipped to provide the insights that the industry requires.

Do you have any final thoughts?

That the communication and PR industry in my mind stands at a crossroads. It has great opportunity but also faces a significant threat. It has to evolve its approach to measurement and evaluation, to focus on demonstrating how we support and drive organisational impact. This involves taking the time to tailor and structure a relevant measurement approach for your own organisation, one that looks across all three dimensions that we have been talking about – outputs, outtakes and outcomes. It involves planning up front and setting targets based around desired outcomes, not just activity. This takes time, and thought and can’t be outsourced to commoditised vendors. It needs relevance, critical thinking and experience.

By Peter Appleby